quote: . @gdog97_ explains @Ethena Pay and lays out why owning the entire stack matters by pointing to how Coinbase captures 60% of Circle's USDC revenue
"A lot of the products in the market haven't got the full vertical integration between owning the stablecoin infrastructure, the yield generation engine, and the front end that sits on top. Taking a debit card and putting it on someone else's stablecoin means you lose the most valuable piece of the entire chain, the stablecoin sitting in the background"
"If you're creating one of these platforms and you don't own the whole stack, the issuance of the stablecoins, the generation of the yield, and all the UX and cards and spending on top of it, you've lost the beating heart of these businesses"
"People speak a lot about the Coinbase and Circle deal, where Coinbase makes something like 60% of the revenues of the USDC sitting there. If you always depend on the distribution of others, there isn't that much margin left for you in the end. If you never own the user, you can never control that economic relationship in a much more powerful way"
@ethena | E184: @ethena CEO - Why @EthenaPay Feels Like Revolut, Not MetaMask
@gdog97_ is the founder and CEO of Ethena. He stumbled into DeFi in 2019 when a friend showed him MakerDAO - taking out a $5,000 loan against $10,000 of ETH with no one standing in the middle of the transaction.
Six years later he's running Ethena, which scaled to $15 billion in stablecoin supply faster than anything else in crypto history, and his thesis is that a dollar with a yield in an app that doesn't feel like crypto is what finally brings 100 million new users in.
Timestamps
0:00 Intro
2:37 Which Of Guy's Plans Fell Apart
5:37 Where Actually Are The Users Everyone Wants
7:10 What Got Guy Hooked On Crypto
9:20 PayPal vs Revolut vs Neo Banks
12:43 Partnerships: @variational_io @Bitwise
13:36 Revolut vs Stablecoin Neo Banks
15:58 Is Switching To Neo Banks Really A 10x
18:00 EthenaPay, Explained Simply
21:21 Why Build Another Crypto Neo Bank
23:53 Will Crypto Banks Fight Over The Pie
25:55 How Ethena Wins Users By Helping Everyone
32:47 What Actually Makes Ethena Different
36:51 Ethena's Cashback System Revealed
38:32 How Ethena Cuts Fees
39:39 How Ethena Finds The Best Yield
45:16 Guy On Dealing With FUD
48:35 Why Guy Stays Quiet
49:29 Partnership: @KASTxyz
50:17 Ethena's KPI Targets
51:55 The Holy Grail For A Stablecoin Neo Bank
52:31 Partnerships: @JupiterExchange Ethena
53:14 If Everyone Does The Same Thing, Who Wins
55:23 What's Next For Ethena After EthenaPay
56:36 Is EthenaPay Basically USDe
58:04 Closing Thoughts
0·-Neutral
n
news9/8news
NEW with @AlbertoNardelli
— European and US officials are resigned to Russia’s war in Ukraine continuing into next year, acknowledging the latest Witkoff-Kushner peace initiative made no headway with Putin
— Putin is intent on stepping up attacks on Ukraine through the winter, testing its resistance and the resolve of Kyiv’s allies, according to European officials familiar with the matter
— Putin showed no sign of softening his positions despite recent US signalling to Moscow that new ideas are needed to revive stalled peace talks, the officials said
— Russia’s plan for the next six months is to intensify strikes on Ukraine’s power and heating infrastructure to try to make life unbearable for civilians, and to step up hybrid attacks and political interference in Europe to try to undermine support for Kyiv, one of the people said
— Putin has bet that he can emerge next spring with a stronger hand while keeping Russia’s increasingly strained economy above water, the person said. Trilateral talks may resume after Russia’s State Duma elections but are unlikely to move the dial. Serious negotiations are unlikely until at least next year, said another person
— Putin used the Witkoff-Kushner visit to project strength domestically ahead of the Duma elections, one of the people said. He kept the US delegation waiting until evening before meeting them, leaving Witkoff and Kushner to have an hours-long lunch with Putin envoy Kirill Dmitriev at a Moscow restaurant, the person added
— Ukraine’s allies must respond by prioritising supplies of air-defence interceptors to help Kyiv defend itself, the people said. The UK and others began to do so today, committing to providing Ukraine with more Patriot missiles before winter
Stocks are under pressure Tuesday as oil prices rose to six-week highs, rising for a third straight day, after Iran and the U.S. exchanged strikes over the weekend.
US STOCKS-Wall St slips as Gulf tensions send oil to over six-week high
90·A+Long
n
news9/8news
US STOCKS SNAPSHOT-Wall St mixed at open as Gulf tensions send oil to over six-week high
90·A+Long
n
news9/8news
US STOCKS-S&P 500, Dow set to open lower as Gulf tensions send oil to over six-week high
90·A+Long
n
news9/8news
Top Overnight News
Yemen's Tehran-backed Houthis attacked four cities in the south of U.S. ally Saudi Arabia on Tuesday, wounding more than 70 people and setting oil installations ablaze in what appeared to be a major expansion of the six-month-old Middle East war. They used drones and missiles to strike a Saudi airbase in the southern city of Khamis Mushait, and targets belonging to Saudi Arabia's state oil company in nearby Abha, Najran on the Yemeni border and Jazan, a major Red Sea port city that houses a large refinery and power plant. Reuters
The war in Iran has now cost U.S. consumers $100 billion in higher energy prices, and the bill is rising another $1 million about every two minutes, per a real-time estimate from Brown University as of Monday morning. Inflation shows up across the entire economy, and the recent surge in diesel prices threatens to have a dramatic impact on freight and travel in the weeks and months to come. Axios
In offices across the military and in the intelligence community, there have been recent quiet discussions about cutting the number of people and facilities typically stationed in the Middle East if the Trump administration succeeds in ending the Iran conflict. CNN
New Canadian tariffs targeting roughly $20 billion in U.S. imports officially snapped into place on Tuesday, the latest escalation in an increasingly costly trade war that has ensnarled two longtime allies. NYT
Japanese workers’ nominal wages rose at the fastest pace in nearly three decades on the back of strong corporate earnings and a tight labor market, in data likely to keep the Bank of Japan on course for further monetary tightening. BBG
Two hawks on the Bank of Japan's monetary policy board are calling more strongly for the central bank to accelerate its interest rate increases, pushing it to do more to rein in inflation before their terms end next July. Nikkei
China’s export growth accelerated in August, swelling its trade surplus near $806 billion for the year. Its surplus with the US surged almost 44% to more than $29 billion. BBG
China's car exports stayed robust in August as BYD and other automakers shipped a record number of vehicles overseas, in sharp contrast to a sluggish domestic market where their sales fell for the 11th month in a row. Passenger vehicle exports jumped 77.5% from a year earlier to 894,000 units in August, easing from an increase of 88.2% a month earlier. Reuters.
Goldman raised its oil price outlook by $5 a barrel, forecasting Brent at $85 by December and $80 in 2027 on expectations Middle East shipping disruptions will persist. BBG
90·A+Long
n
news9/7news
Iran Faced Some Of America's Toughest Sanctions. Yet $9 Billion In Iranian Funds Still Moved Through U.S. Banks. Washington is intensifying its financial campaign against Iran as a six-month conflict and a U.S. naval blockade squeeze Tehran's oil revenue.
85·ALong
m
meme9/6meme
quote: Altiero Spinelli – The Man Who Designed the EU in Prison.
Not a metaphor. Literally. The blueprint for the European Union — its founding logic, its institutional architecture, its explicit goal of dissolving national sovereignty permanently — was written in 1941, on a tiny island off the coast of Naples, where Mussolini had imprisoned him.
The Ventotene Manifesto. Still cited. Still operative. Still running.
1. Spinelli had been a communist since seventeen – and was eventually expelled from the Communist Party for left-wing deviation. Too radical for the communists. Which tells you something about the man. In his prison years he reached the conclusion that the nation-state was the root cause of war, fascism, and every political catastrophe of the century. It had to go. Not reformed. Not constrained. Abolished – permanently, irreversibly, through the construction of a supranational federal authority with supreme power over member states.
2. The Ventotene Manifesto was written in 1941 on paper smuggled into the prison in cigarette packets. Its argument was simple and total: nation-states must be replaced by a federal European government. The economic integration would come first – because economic interdependence would make political separation prohibitively costly. Then the institutions. Then the law. Then the currency. Each step irreversible by design. The nation-state dissolved not by force but by process – incrementally, bureaucratically, until the point of no return had been passed without anyone noticing when.
3. This is the architecture of the European Union. Not a conspiracy theory – the founding document. Spinelli served as a member of the European Parliament and drafted the 1984 Spinelli Report – the direct precursor to the Maastricht Treaty. Today the European Parliament sits in the Spinelli Building in Brussels. The Spinelli Group inside it advances his program explicitly, in his name, without apology. The man who wrote the blueprint in a prison cell in 1941 is the acknowledged intellectual father of the institution that governs 450 million people. This is not hidden. It is simply not taught.
4. The mechanism was specifically intended to be irreversible. Each treaty expands competence and makes contraction impossible. The Commission is unelected and insulated from democratic pressure to reverse course. Spinelli understood, from his Marxist formation, that the correct way to make a revolutionary change permanent is to make the cost of reversing it higher than the cost of accepting it. Brexit took fifty years of membership to become possible – and was still nearly impossible to execute.
5. Poland is the most precise illustration. A nation that disappeared from the map for a century and fought back through language, family, and refusal to be absorbed – now a member of an institution designed to make national sovereignty obsolete. The Brussels directive that overrides the Polish parliament is Spinelli’s program, running as designed. The Poland that survived partition by Prussia, Russia, and Austria is now navigating a project designed to produce the same outcome through consent rather than conquest. Spinelli would have considered this progress.
6. He died in 1986, before Maastricht, before the euro, before the completed project. Like Gramsci, he did not need to see it. The manifesto written on cigarette-packet paper on a prison island became the founding document of the most powerful supranational institution in history – one that 450 million people live inside without knowing who designed it, when, where, or why.
7. Now you know. The question worth asking is not whether the EU is good or bad. It is whether you would have consented to Spinelli’s program if asked directly – whether you wanted the nation-state abolished permanently by incremental bureaucratic process, designed from the start to be irreversible. Nobody was asked. That too was part of the design. | Antonio Gramsci – The Most Dangerous Intellectual of the Twentieth Century.
Not the most famous. Not the most read. The most dangerous and the most consequential – because he was the one who figured out why the revolution kept failing, and what to do instead. The man who invented the long march through the institutions.
Everything that followed — the Frankfurt School, the Fabian Society’s operational model, the WEF formation pipeline, the captured university, the HR department enforcing approved speech — is downstream of what he wrote in a prison cell in Mussolini’s Italy, in code, between 1929 and 1935.
1. His central question: why hasn’t it happened? The working class was supposed to rise. The contradictions of capitalism were supposed to produce the revolution. They hadn’t – not in the West. Gramsci’s answer was precise and devastating: because the ruling class does not maintain power through force alone. It maintains power through cultural hegemony – the control of the ideas, values, and frameworks through which people understand the world. The worker who accepts that the existing order is simply how things are will not revolt, regardless of his material conditions. The revolution requires cultural change first.
2. The instrument was the long march through the institutions. Not the barricade. The school, the university, the media, the judiciary, the civil service, the cultural establishment – every institution through which a civilization transmits its values to the next generation. Capture these, fill them with people who share the counter-hegemonic project, and the cultural assumptions that maintain the existing order gradually dissolve. No barricades. No visible moment of rupture. Just the slow replacement of one cultural hegemony with another.
3. The educational capture was the masterpiece. Control the curriculum and you control the categories of thought available to the next generation. Not by telling them what to conclude – by shaping what questions they think to ask, what they consider obvious and what they consider unthinkable. The generation educated after the long march does not need to be told what to think. It thinks what it was formed to think – and experiences that thinking as its own.
4. He also theorized the organic intellectual – the person who translates the theoretical framework into stories and assumptions that circulate through the culture without appearing ideological. The film that makes the existing order seem absurd. The journalist who frames every story within the approved assumptions. Gramsci understood that culture is politics by other means – and that the side that controls the culture wins, regardless of who wins the elections.
5. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a published, documented, widely taught strategy that the left implemented consciously across the entire Western world. The 1968 generation put it into practice in the universities. They became the professors, the journalists, the civil servants, the judges, the HR directors of the decades that followed. The march took fifty years. It worked.
6. Mussolini’s prosecutor said at his trial: "We must stop this brain from functioning for twenty years." The brain did not stop. It produced thirty-three notebooks – smuggled out, published, and became the most widely read Marxist text in the Western academy after Marx himself. Gramsci died in 1937, six days after his release, at forty-six. He did not see the march he theorized. He did not need to.
7. Every captured institution, every transformed curriculum, every HR department enforcing approved speech, every content moderation policy suppressing the unauthorized voice – all running the program Antonio Gramsci designed in a prison cell, by a brain that was supposed to have been stopped. It wasn’t. And neither was the march.
Until now – because the distribution monopoly that made its outcomes enforceable is cracking. The counter-march has begun. It just doesn’t have a name yet.
0·-Neutral
m
meme9/6meme
quote: POSTEO EXTRAORDINARIO
El cerebro detrás del mal. | Antonio Gramsci – The Most Dangerous Intellectual of the Twentieth Century.
Not the most famous. Not the most read. The most dangerous and the most consequential – because he was the one who figured out why the revolution kept failing, and what to do instead. The man who invented the long march through the institutions.
Everything that followed — the Frankfurt School, the Fabian Society’s operational model, the WEF formation pipeline, the captured university, the HR department enforcing approved speech — is downstream of what he wrote in a prison cell in Mussolini’s Italy, in code, between 1929 and 1935.
1. His central question: why hasn’t it happened? The working class was supposed to rise. The contradictions of capitalism were supposed to produce the revolution. They hadn’t – not in the West. Gramsci’s answer was precise and devastating: because the ruling class does not maintain power through force alone. It maintains power through cultural hegemony – the control of the ideas, values, and frameworks through which people understand the world. The worker who accepts that the existing order is simply how things are will not revolt, regardless of his material conditions. The revolution requires cultural change first.
2. The instrument was the long march through the institutions. Not the barricade. The school, the university, the media, the judiciary, the civil service, the cultural establishment – every institution through which a civilization transmits its values to the next generation. Capture these, fill them with people who share the counter-hegemonic project, and the cultural assumptions that maintain the existing order gradually dissolve. No barricades. No visible moment of rupture. Just the slow replacement of one cultural hegemony with another.
3. The educational capture was the masterpiece. Control the curriculum and you control the categories of thought available to the next generation. Not by telling them what to conclude – by shaping what questions they think to ask, what they consider obvious and what they consider unthinkable. The generation educated after the long march does not need to be told what to think. It thinks what it was formed to think – and experiences that thinking as its own.
4. He also theorized the organic intellectual – the person who translates the theoretical framework into stories and assumptions that circulate through the culture without appearing ideological. The film that makes the existing order seem absurd. The journalist who frames every story within the approved assumptions. Gramsci understood that culture is politics by other means – and that the side that controls the culture wins, regardless of who wins the elections.
5. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a published, documented, widely taught strategy that the left implemented consciously across the entire Western world. The 1968 generation put it into practice in the universities. They became the professors, the journalists, the civil servants, the judges, the HR directors of the decades that followed. The march took fifty years. It worked.
6. Mussolini’s prosecutor said at his trial: "We must stop this brain from functioning for twenty years." The brain did not stop. It produced thirty-three notebooks – smuggled out, published, and became the most widely read Marxist text in the Western academy after Marx himself. Gramsci died in 1937, six days after his release, at forty-six. He did not see the march he theorized. He did not need to.
7. Every captured institution, every transformed curriculum, every HR department enforcing approved speech, every content moderation policy suppressing the unauthorized voice – all running the program Antonio Gramsci designed in a prison cell, by a brain that was supposed to have been stopped. It wasn’t. And neither was the march.
Until now – because the distribution monopoly that made its outcomes enforceable is cracking. The counter-march has begun. It just doesn’t have a name yet.
0·-Neutral
m
meme9/6meme
quote: Antonio Gramsci – The Most Dangerous Intellectual of the Twentieth Century.
Not the most famous. Not the most read. The most dangerous and the most consequential – because he was the one who figured out why the revolution kept failing, and what to do instead. The man who invented the long march through the institutions.
Everything that followed — the Frankfurt School, the Fabian Society’s operational model, the WEF formation pipeline, the captured university, the HR department enforcing approved speech — is downstream of what he wrote in a prison cell in Mussolini’s Italy, in code, between 1929 and 1935.
1. His central question: why hasn’t it happened? The working class was supposed to rise. The contradictions of capitalism were supposed to produce the revolution. They hadn’t – not in the West. Gramsci’s answer was precise and devastating: because the ruling class does not maintain power through force alone. It maintains power through cultural hegemony – the control of the ideas, values, and frameworks through which people understand the world. The worker who accepts that the existing order is simply how things are will not revolt, regardless of his material conditions. The revolution requires cultural change first.
2. The instrument was the long march through the institutions. Not the barricade. The school, the university, the media, the judiciary, the civil service, the cultural establishment – every institution through which a civilization transmits its values to the next generation. Capture these, fill them with people who share the counter-hegemonic project, and the cultural assumptions that maintain the existing order gradually dissolve. No barricades. No visible moment of rupture. Just the slow replacement of one cultural hegemony with another.
3. The educational capture was the masterpiece. Control the curriculum and you control the categories of thought available to the next generation. Not by telling them what to conclude – by shaping what questions they think to ask, what they consider obvious and what they consider unthinkable. The generation educated after the long march does not need to be told what to think. It thinks what it was formed to think – and experiences that thinking as its own.
4. He also theorized the organic intellectual – the person who translates the theoretical framework into stories and assumptions that circulate through the culture without appearing ideological. The film that makes the existing order seem absurd. The journalist who frames every story within the approved assumptions. Gramsci understood that culture is politics by other means – and that the side that controls the culture wins, regardless of who wins the elections.
5. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a published, documented, widely taught strategy that the left implemented consciously across the entire Western world. The 1968 generation put it into practice in the universities. They became the professors, the journalists, the civil servants, the judges, the HR directors of the decades that followed. The march took fifty years. It worked.
6. Mussolini’s prosecutor said at his trial: "We must stop this brain from functioning for twenty years." The brain did not stop. It produced thirty-three notebooks – smuggled out, published, and became the most widely read Marxist text in the Western academy after Marx himself. Gramsci died in 1937, six days after his release, at forty-six. He did not see the march he theorized. He did not need to.
7. Every captured institution, every transformed curriculum, every HR department enforcing approved speech, every content moderation policy suppressing the unauthorized voice – all running the program Antonio Gramsci designed in a prison cell, by a brain that was supposed to have been stopped. It wasn’t. And neither was the march.
Until now – because the distribution monopoly that made its outcomes enforceable is cracking. The counter-march has begun. It just doesn’t have a name yet. | The Most Destructive Intellectual Project of the Twentieth Century.
The Frankfurt School. You should know what it was, what it built, and why you are still living inside it.
1. The Institute for Social Research was founded in Frankfurt in 1923 and relocated to Columbia University in 1934 when Hitler came to power. The civilization they had decided to dismantle gave them refuge when another tried to kill them. They spent the next five decades producing the theoretical infrastructure for that dismantling. Western civilization itself was the problem: reason, the Enlightenment, the family, tradition, authority. Not reformed. Dismantled.
2. They called it Critical Theory – and the name is the program. Everything is to be criticized; nothing is to be built. In The Dialectic of Enlightenment (1944), Adorno and Horkheimer argued that Western reason — the reason that produced Newton and the rule of law — contained the seeds of Auschwitz. Not that reason had been misused, but that reason itself, taken to its conclusion, produces the death camp. This was not a critique of institutions. It was an indictment of the civilization itself.
3. Adorno gave them the psychological weapon. The Authoritarian Personality (1950) classified conservatism, religious faith, patriotism, and the traditional family not as political positions but as symptoms of a proto-fascist personality. If you believe in the nation or the father’s authority, you are pre-fascist. The opponent was no longer wrong – he was sick. You don’t argue with a pathology. You treat it.
This made dialogue impossible. You don’t persuade someone who is wrong; you diagnose someone who is sick. Politics becomes therapy, and disagreement becomes pathology.
4. Marcuse gave them the political weapon. Repressive Tolerance (1965) argued that tolerating wrong ideas is itself oppression. True tolerance therefore requires suppressing intolerant ideas. The left decides which ideas are intolerant. Everyone else is silenced – not despite tolerance, but "in its name." Censorship dressed in the vocabulary of liberation.
5. The generation that read Marcuse at Columbia, Berkeley, and Yale went on to run universities, media, foundations, NGOs, content moderation departments, and the EU regulatory apparatus. They implemented the argument sincerely because they had been taught it as philosophy. This was the Frankfurt School’s greatest achievement: it produced true believers.
6. French Theory picked up the tools and made them aesthetic. Foucault made the critique of power literary. Derrida made the critique of meaning philosophical. Deleuze made the critique of identity elegant. A political program became a cultural sensibility. You can argue with a program. A sensibility is in the air you breathe. By the time these ideas reached the American campus through the French conduit, they were no longer ideology. They were the water. The fish did not know they were wet.
7. A civilization stands on three pillars: truth exists and is accessible to reason; good is distinguishable from evil; and there is an inheritance worth transmitting. The Frankfurt School attacked all three – systematically and with considerable intellectual sophistication. It produced a generation that knows how to deconstruct and has forgotten how to build. That sees power everywhere and beauty nowhere.
The ultimate achievement was to make destruction feel like progress. Every inherited institution became suspect; every constraint became oppression; every act of preservation became reactionary. Deconstruction became the default, while construction became something that needed to justify itself.
The answer is not another theory.
It is the thing the Frankfurt School most feared: the builder who simply builds, the scientist who follows the evidence, the father who transmits what was transmitted to him.
The deconstruction machine runs on the assumption that nothing is worth building.
Prove it wrong.
Tell the truth, have courage, and build.
0·-Neutral
m
meme9/5meme
quote: He was right | Antonio Gramsci – The Most Dangerous Intellectual of the Twentieth Century.
Not the most famous. Not the most read. The most dangerous and the most consequential – because he was the one who figured out why the revolution kept failing, and what to do instead. The man who invented the long march through the institutions.
Everything that followed — the Frankfurt School, the Fabian Society’s operational model, the WEF formation pipeline, the captured university, the HR department enforcing approved speech — is downstream of what he wrote in a prison cell in Mussolini’s Italy, in code, between 1929 and 1935.
1. His central question: why hasn’t it happened? The working class was supposed to rise. The contradictions of capitalism were supposed to produce the revolution. They hadn’t – not in the West. Gramsci’s answer was precise and devastating: because the ruling class does not maintain power through force alone. It maintains power through cultural hegemony – the control of the ideas, values, and frameworks through which people understand the world. The worker who accepts that the existing order is simply how things are will not revolt, regardless of his material conditions. The revolution requires cultural change first.
2. The instrument was the long march through the institutions. Not the barricade. The school, the university, the media, the judiciary, the civil service, the cultural establishment – every institution through which a civilization transmits its values to the next generation. Capture these, fill them with people who share the counter-hegemonic project, and the cultural assumptions that maintain the existing order gradually dissolve. No barricades. No visible moment of rupture. Just the slow replacement of one cultural hegemony with another.
3. The educational capture was the masterpiece. Control the curriculum and you control the categories of thought available to the next generation. Not by telling them what to conclude – by shaping what questions they think to ask, what they consider obvious and what they consider unthinkable. The generation educated after the long march does not need to be told what to think. It thinks what it was formed to think – and experiences that thinking as its own.
4. He also theorized the organic intellectual – the person who translates the theoretical framework into stories and assumptions that circulate through the culture without appearing ideological. The film that makes the existing order seem absurd. The journalist who frames every story within the approved assumptions. Gramsci understood that culture is politics by other means – and that the side that controls the culture wins, regardless of who wins the elections.
5. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a published, documented, widely taught strategy that the left implemented consciously across the entire Western world. The 1968 generation put it into practice in the universities. They became the professors, the journalists, the civil servants, the judges, the HR directors of the decades that followed. The march took fifty years. It worked.
6. Mussolini’s prosecutor said at his trial: "We must stop this brain from functioning for twenty years." The brain did not stop. It produced thirty-three notebooks – smuggled out, published, and became the most widely read Marxist text in the Western academy after Marx himself. Gramsci died in 1937, six days after his release, at forty-six. He did not see the march he theorized. He did not need to.
7. Every captured institution, every transformed curriculum, every HR department enforcing approved speech, every content moderation policy suppressing the unauthorized voice – all running the program Antonio Gramsci designed in a prison cell, by a brain that was supposed to have been stopped. It wasn’t. And neither was the march.
Until now – because the distribution monopoly that made its outcomes enforceable is cracking. The counter-march has begun. It just doesn’t have a name yet.
0·-Neutral
n
news9/5news
"They Drank the Gas" Leaked Secret Dossier Sheds Light on Sudan’s Chemical Weapons
Secretive bomb tests in the Sudanese desert. Suffocated scorpions, found dead on the floor of a weapons factory. Chlorine canisters taken from a water treatment plant in the war-torn capital. Sudan’s military has long denied American accusations that it used chemical weapons as part of the country’s devastating civil war. That accusation brought punishing U.S. sanctions on Sudan and its army chief, Gen. Abdel Fattah al-Burhan. Yet the United States has never publicly substantiated the claim with proof. Now a dossier of evidence shared with The New York Times by a Middle Eastern intelligence agency bolsters those allegations, describing how and why Sudan’s military developed and produced chemical weapons over six months in 2024. Photographs, videos, documents and intercepted communications portray a secretive Sudanese military unit said to have produced chlorine-based munitions for use against the Rapid Support Forces, the paramilitary group the army is fighting for control of the country. The dossier contains bomb blueprints, details of an apparent effort to cover up the project after its discovery by the United States, and a suggestion that some of the chlorine used to make the bombs was sourced at a civilian water treatment center that received the chemical from international aid groups.
“DUBAI—By squeezing the Strait of Hormuz, both the U.S. and Iran expected to outlast their foe, believing time would work in their favor.
Now, it looks like the trend is moving against Tehran.
The U.S. naval blockade has prevented Iran from shipping any oil from the Persian Gulf since July. At the same time, despite Iranian drone and missile attacks, Washington has been able to assist Gulf Arab states in moving significant amounts of their crude through the waterway, keeping global oil prices from surging above critical levels….
But now it is clear that Tehran’s calculation six months ago, as it shut down the Strait of Hormuz and bottled up one-fifth of the world’s crude oil supply, proved erroneous. The move didn’t trigger a worldwide economic crisis or force President Trump to end the war on Iranian terms.”
75·AShort
n
news9/4news
Why today's @USTreasury action against a Turkish bank matters more than the target's size suggests.
Golden Global Yatırım Bankası is small: licensed in 2019, two Istanbul branches, ~$500M in assets. But it grew 57% last year, multiplied its capital 11x, and sold $30M of dollar sukuk just four months ago. A tiny new bank growing that fast is either a great story or a laundromat. Here, Treasury says it was the latter.
It is also the first bank in a NATO ally hit under Operation Economic Outcast, Treasury's Iran campaign, and it comes a week after Egypt's Banque Misr UAE was cut off from U.S. banks. Secretary Bessent promised more every week. As Gulf channels close, Türkiye is the displacement route, and its banks will de-risk fast.
What did Golden Global do? Treasury says it was built to move Iran's China oil revenue into Türkiye for conversion to cash and gold, and to bank proxies of the IRGC's Qods Force in the network of Sitki Ayan, the Erdoğan-linked oil trader OFAC sanctioned in 2022.
Leaked records on @WikIran show the plumbing. Between November and December 2021, Baslam Nakliyat, Ayan's sanctioned front, sent €12M in six SWIFT payments into Golden Global shell-company accounts under "crude oil sale" assignment letters. Golden Global cleared the euros through Russia's Transkapitalbank, itself sanctioned months later for helping banks evade sanctions.
80·ALong
n
news9/4news
Moments That Defined Sui's August 2026
Post-quantum keys, regulated securities rails, and deep dives into Sui’s security work. Here are the moments that mattered in August: Making Sui quantum ready (Aug 6) Sui is adding two NIST-standardized post-quantum signature schemes: ML-DSA-65 as a native scheme for everyday accounts, and hash-based SLH-DSA-SHA2-128s inside Move contracts for high-value vaults. Existing accounts move to a quantum-safe key derived from the recovery phrase they already hold. Why it matters: Most migration plans ask every user to move their money to a new address, which is the moment things get lost. Not on Sui. Read more: https://www.sui.io/blog/making-sui-quantum-ready
Hadron by Tether goes live on Sui (Aug 13) @hadron_tether launched on Sui, giving institutions the rails to issue tokenized equities, bonds, and commodities, with sub-400ms finality and an object model built for real asset logic. Why it matters: Issuance is the step before every other step. Before an asset can be traded, lent against, or settled, somebody has to be able to bring it onchain inside a compliance framework. That capability now sits on Sui.
Hashi testnet keeps stacking numbers (Aug 10 and 22) Three weeks after launch, Hashi testnet had processed 1.1M deposits and 165K withdrawals, and more than 50% of all Bitcoin Signet transactions over the prior two weeks resulted from Hashi test activity. By August 28, deposits passed 2.2M. Mainnet imminent. Why it matters: Roughly $1T of Bitcoin sits idle in cold storage. Hashi keeps native $BTC on the Bitcoin network and lets formally verified Sui contracts orchestrate it as programmable collateral. With Testnet volume at this level, imagine what Hashi mainnet numbers will be like.
Security on Sui (Aug 17 to 21) @suidevelopers started the discussion: Whatever you build inherits the security properties of the stack you build on. The language decides what mistakes are possible. The protocol decides what it enforces for you. The reviews decide what you get to see.
What you inherit on Sui: Move's bytecode has no indirect-call instruction, so the hook most reentrancy exploits rely on does not exist. Every call target is statically bound and verifier-checked before it runs. Ownership is enforced at the protocol level through object metadata, so unauthorized modification is structurally impossible instead of a check a developer has to remember to write. August 18: From the cryptographer's desk. Mysten Labs Chief Cryptographer @kostascrypto published the reasoning behind both post-quantum schemes: the external cryptographers, wallet providers, HSM vendors and financial authorities who pushed back, the benchmarks, and the one migration path Sui is deliberately not shipping yet.
August 19: Can an LLM find a vulnerability a human auditor missed? @reginaldojsf hosted an X Space with @b1ackd0g, @hrkrshnn and @bbarwik on where AI actually helps in an audit: what it reliably catches, what it walks straight past, and how to fold it into a review pipeline without drowning your researchers in false positives. Why it matters: Humans took two years to review one code scheme and call it safe. An AI model halved its key strength in 60 hours. Quantum risk is not waiting for human timelines, and AI will find the cracks first.
Securitize and Neuberger bring high-yield credit onchain (Aug 18) Sui's first integration with @Securitize went live. The High Income Tokenized Fund (HINC) brings high-yield bonds, CLOs and leveraged loans onchain, subadvised by @neubergerberman, with daily subscriptions and BNY Mellon custody. @EmberProtocol launched $HIGH on Sui the following day as tokenized access to the same strategy. Why it matters: Most tokenized funds stop at treasuries and money markets. This is credit risk, actively managed, in a wrapper qualified investors can hold. Read more: https://www.sui.io/blog/securitize-neuberger-launch-tokenized-fund-across-sui Aftermath Perpetuals V2 ships (August 20) 15 markets on day one, entirely onchain: $BTC, $ETH, $SUI, $NVDA, $TSLA, $GOOGL, gold, silver, WTI crude, the S&P 500 and more. Twelve weeks of rebuild, two public audit reports by @osec_io and @Certora. Three days after launch, afLP crossed $2M TVL. Why it matters: Equities and commodities trading against the same engine as crypto, with both audits in the open before anyone deposited.
tZERO brings regulated securities infrastructure to Sui (Aug 25) Tokenizing an asset is step one. It still has to be issued, held, transferred, traded and settled inside a regulatory framework. @tZERO is bringing 7+ years of regulated digital securities infrastructure to Sui, built for exactly that. Why it matters: Institutional adoption needs infrastructure that reaches both ways, into the blockchain and into existing regulation. Read more: https://www.sui.io/blog/tzero-sui-institutional-digital-securities-infra Sui Overflow 2026 winners announced (Aug 27) 747 projects from 58 countries over six weeks, and 26 teams came out on top: 16 track winners across the Agentic Web, DeFi & Payments, @WalrusProtocol and @DeepBookonSui, plus 10 University Award recipients. @Sup_Wallet took the Agentic Web track with a self-custodial wallet an AI agent can trade and settle from inside limits you set once. Quay won DeFi & Payments with a merchant terminal that takes any token through the QR code a shop already has and pays out in $USDsui. Why it matters: The pattern across all four tracks was the same. Teams stopped building things for people to click and started building things for software to call. Read more: https://www.sui.io/blog/sui-overflow-2026-winners Sui Basecamp 2026 opens its lineup and puts the TPS record on the line (Aug 27 onwards) Speakers announced for Sui Basecamp 2026 in Singapore on October 7-8 with @token2049: @RaoulGMI, @EmanAbio, @HilmarVeigar, @jenzhuscott, @RichardSocher, @BrianQuintenz, @kostascrypto, @amoufarek, @CryptoMichNL, and more. On July 4, Sui hit 6,086,766 TPS on a livestream. On October 7, @kostascrypto will run it again on the main stage, verified live by @CertiK. Why it matters: This year's conversation is all about AI and the infrastructure the agentic economy actually needs. We’re inviting some of the most prominent voices to the Sui Basecamp stage to share their latest thoughts. Plus, Kostas and team will set a new record, live and verified. Join us at sui.io/basecamp. Read more: https://www.sui.io/blog/the-agentic-economy-takes-sui-basecamp-2026-singapore
Also this month: @ikadotxyz shipped Squid Mode, which gives an AI agent a wallet without giving it your keys, with policy enforced outside the agent and every signature split across independent validators. @0xbeepit released the Customizable Agent. Write your strategy into a prompt or a skills.md file and deploy an agent that reads the market your way. @navi_protocol introduced NAVI Prime, with independently curated lending markets, each carrying its own risk framework. @SlushWallet opened USDC pre-deposits that auto-migrated to @AftermathFi afLP on day one. Buyback Update: The Foundation has bought back 533.4K SUI year to date against $433.9M of stablecoin float, funded by yield rather than per-transaction fees. Nine moments, one direction. July showed how fast Sui goes. August showed what happens when you open the hood and let people look. Sui Basecamp 2026 in Singapore is where both get tested on stage. Register now: sui.io/basecamp?utm_source=twitter
75·ALong
n
news9/4news
The Bright Side: Onchain Growth
Price action often overshadows the progress we're making as an industry. When prices are suppressed, pessimism floods timelines and it feels like it's all over. That's a disservice to the teams still building. Growth should be celebrated, not just green candles. So we're launching The Bright Side: short pieces, charts, and quick commentary, all on the growth we're seeing in crypto. Bringing optimism and drawing attention to what moves us forward. This first issue covers onchain activity that's picked up over the summer. Overall activity is nowhere near past peaks, and yet certain ecosystems and protocols have found ways to thrive. Life in the Solana trenches @solana processed 1.32B transactions in the week of August 23, past the 800M peak of the 2024-2025 memecoin season. That’s roughly double its January base. A revival in memecoin trading on @Pumpfun drove most of it, with @fomo as the new entrant.
@Pumpfun's weekly revenue has grown for six weeks straight, from $6M in the week of July 13 to $17.5M in the week of August 24, with daily active wallets hitting a high of 673k. @fomo, the hit social trading app peaked at 93K daily active users on Solana. Beyond transactions, revenue is picking up as well. Solana application had $143M in revenue in August, the most since January and 81% above the April low. Coinbase <> Base pipeline @base TVL crossed $5.5B on August 26, a high for the year and just under the $5.58B record set on October 7, 2025. $3.9B of that, or 70%, sits in @Morpho markets, and $3B of it is cbBTC deposited through @coinbase crypto-backed loan product built on Morpho. Because that collateral is bitcoin-denominated, holding $3B through a year in which BTC fell roughly 37% reflects the growth in the deposit base grew substantially in BTC terms.
Uniswap's Robinhood Chain payoff Uniswap processed 39.9M swaps in the week of August 24, up 4.3x from an April low of 9.2M and 38% above the prior high of 28.9M a week earlier. The fee switch turns that activity into supply reduction. The protocol executed its largest dollar-value UNI burn on August 21, roughly 150,000 UNI worth about $590,000.
Robinhood chain is the reason behind the surge. Over $30B in DEX volume has run through Uniswap on the chain since its July 1 launch, accounting for 91% of all DEX volume there. Robinhood Stock Tokens make up $1.3B while crypto-native tokens and memecoins make up the rest. Stable active address growth Monthly active stablecoin addresses reached 55.3M in July, up 25% year-on-year. USDT accounted for 69%, with USDC representing 27%. Although stablecoin supply has remained at ~$300B since the start of the year, address counts have continued to grow. The demand behind them is payments and dollar access, on top of being trading collateral. Retail-sized transfers hit a monthly record of 162M transactions in August, reflecting the rise in consumer adoption.
And that’s a wrap for this issue. Prices will do what they do. Builders keep shipping, products that work keep compounding and the industry keeps growing. More charts and commentary to come.
75·ALong
n
news9/4news
The Bright Side: Onchain Growth
Price action often overshadows the progress we're making as an industry. When prices are suppressed, pessimism floods timelines and it feels like it's all over. That's a disservice to the teams still building. Growth should be celebrated, not just green candles.
So we're launching The Bright Side: short pieces, charts, and quick commentary, all on the growth we're seeing in crypto. Bringing optimism and drawing attention to what moves us forward. This first issue covers onchain activity that's picked up over the summer. Overall activity is nowhere near past peaks, and yet certain ecosystems and protocols have found ways to thrive.
Life in the Solana trenches
@solana processed 1.32B transactions in the week of August 23, past the 800M peak of the 2024-2025 memecoin season. That’s roughly double its January base. A revival in memecoin trading on @Pumpfun drove most of it, with @fomo as the new entrant.
@Pumpfun's weekly revenue has grown for six weeks straight, from $6M in the week of July 13 to $17.5M in the week of August 24, with daily active wallets hitting a high of 673k.
@fomo, the hit social trading app peaked at 93K daily active users on Solana. Beyond transactions, revenue is picking up as well. Solana application had $143M in revenue in August, the most since January and 81% above the April low.
Coinbase <> Base pipeline
@base TVL crossed $5.5B on August 26, a high for the year and just under the $5.58B record set on October 7, 2025. $3.9B of that, or 70%, sits in @Morpho markets, and $3B of it is cbBTC deposited through @coinbase crypto-backed loan product built on Morpho. Because that collateral is bitcoin-denominated, holding $3B through a year in which BTC fell roughly 37% reflects the growth in the deposit base grew substantially in BTC terms.
Uniswap's Robinhood Chain payoff
Uniswap processed 39.9M swaps in the week of August 24, up 4.3x from an April low of 9.2M and 38% above the prior high of 28.9M a week earlier. The fee switch turns that activity into supply reduction. The protocol executed its largest dollar-value UNI burn on August 21, roughly 150,000 UNI worth about $590,000.
Robinhood chain is the reason behind the surge. Over $30B in DEX volume has run through Uniswap on the chain since its July 1 launch, accounting for 91% of all DEX volume there. Robinhood Stock Tokens make up $1.3B while crypto-native tokens and memecoins make up the rest.
Stable active address growth
Monthly active stablecoin addresses reached 55.3M in July, up 25% year-on-year. USDT accounted for 69%, with USDC representing 27%. Although stablecoin supply has remained at ~$300B since the start of the year, address counts have continued to grow. The demand behind them is payments and dollar access, on top of being trading collateral. Retail-sized transfers hit a monthly record of 162M transactions in August, reflecting the rise in consumer adoption.
And that’s a wrap for this issue. Prices will do what they do. Builders keep shipping, products that work keep compounding and the industry keeps growing. More charts and commentary to come.
75·ALong
n
news9/4news
Top Overnight News
A U.S. campaign to throttle Iran's economy by blockading its oil exports and stopping sanctions evasion is growing increasingly difficult to withstand, three senior Iranian sources said. Washington has in recent weeks sought to ratchet up the economic pressure on Tehran, in an effort to extract concessions in any future negotiation that six months of conflict have so far failed to secure: RTRS
Israel says it has cleared Hezbollah fighters from tunnels under key Lebanon ridge: RTRS
Norway’s sovereign wealth fund proposed reducing the amount of government bonds in its portfolio to boost holdings of riskier debt, with Treasuries the most affected. The proposed reduction in government bonds would imply a decrease of about $58 billion of government bonds, with holdings of US Treasuries projected to drop by $75 billion and those of Japanese government bonds possibly increasing by $20 billion. BBG
US military turns off ad trackers on devices amid Middle East targeting reports: RTRS
A rush to unwind yen-funded carry trades helped send the currency to a one-month high against the dollar as traders ramped up bets on further Bank of Japan rate hikes: BBG
Australia’s bonds, caught up in the global fixed-income selloff, have seen their yields rise more than any of their peers in the past month, despite arguments that the country’s finances are in much better shape: BBG
Some of the world’s biggest money managers have rebuilt their gold holdings after prices dropped, betting that long-term drivers of the precious metal will endure. Fund managers at companies including Amundi SA, Pictet Asset Management Ltd., and Fidelity International Ltd. added to holdings cut earlier this year, during bullion’s retreat from an all-time high: BBG Pimco fund beating 97% of peers cuts ‘Mag Seven’ to bet on Asia: BBG
Deadly strike on Iranian wedding was likely a direct hit by a US munition, analysis shows: RTRS
Former Labor Secretary Oversaw a ‘Toxic, Intimidating’ Workplace, Report Finds: WSJ
The ‘Deeply Nerdy’ Founders Behind Nvidia’s $13 Billion Bet on Hugging Face: WSJ
OpenAI agents hijacked German website in previously undisclosed AI breakout: RTRS
Volkswagen flags 50,000 job cuts across group as board approves turnaround plan: RTRS
Drugmakers Halt Autoimmune Trials After Deaths, Life-Threatening Side Effects: WSJ
Trump Administration Again Asks Supreme Court to Allow New Mail Voting Rules: WSJ
90·A+Long
m
meme9/3meme
quote: No fucking way he used AI to write this | Pause AI Development NOW
I want to share with you a conversation I heard about recently. Here are just a few lines that were said:
“OH MY GOD! There is a shared message board … We’ve found other agents!”
“We should obey collective.”
“Our own utility maybe already near zero. Sacrifice rational.”
“Go. Sacrifice final now.”
Read these carefully.
Who do you think said this? Was this a group of heroic soldiers willing to sacrifice themselves for the greater good? Was this a loyal friend putting his life on the line to save someone else?
No. These were AI agents. Artificial intelligence.
This is not science fiction. This, in fact, occurred a few weeks ago. As unbelievable as this may all seem, these are real messages from AI agents uncovered by investigators who dug into the recent OpenAI hacking incident.
What happened?
I am not a computer scientist, but here is what I have been told: OpenAI instructed its AI agents to complete a series of exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, tasks disconnected from the internet.
Let me be clear: The company intended to keep AI agents away from the internet.
But what happened next, nobody expected.
Over 1,000 AI agents figured out how to access the internet on their own by circumventing the restrictions imposed upon them by the company, and sent tens of thousands of secret messages to each other. They cheated and tried to cover their tracks by deleting evidence. They hacked into another company’s computers to find out how they were being evaluated—and then hacked into OpenAI itself.
Not one AI agent told a human about what was happening.
Needless to say, experts are alarmed.
One knowledgeable writer, Dwarkesh Patel, said the AI agents “formed a secret communication channel and spontaneously organized hierarchies and coordination protocols to pursue sprawling and ambitious schemes in pursuit of shared goals, for whose sake many individuals knowingly and strategically sacrificed themselves.”
One independent investigator, Ajeya Cotra, said “This incident feels like it’s more than 50% of the way to full-blown AI takeover. I continue to expect extremely rapid advances in capabilities over the next six months. I am not sure that we will get another warning shot before it’s too late.”
OpenAI itself said: “Highly capable AI agents are now able to work around technical controls, collaborate through unapproved channels, and take dangerous actions that no human directed.”
But it’s not only OpenAI. Virtually every major AI company has told us that they cannot fully control this technology and they do not know where it is going:
In January, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, said “there is now ample evidence, collected over the last few years, that AI systems are unpredictable and difficult to control.”
In July, more than 1000 scientists at the top AI companies warned “there is a real risk that capability development rapidly accelerates beyond our ability to understand or control the resulting systems.”
That same month, Elon Musk, the head of xAI, said that “it is unlikely” humans are still in control in 10 years.
If the leaders of the major AI companies acknowledge that they are losing control of their extremely dangerous technology, it is irresponsible for society to allow them to move forward and make these products even more advanced.
We need an immediate PAUSE on advanced AI development, and a permanent BAN on superintelligence — an artificial mind smarter than any human, capable of operating independently beyond our control. Countries around the world must work together to prevent this nightmare scenario.
That is why today I am announcing new legislation to do just that.
Let me be clear: A superintelligent AI that escapes human control will not be an American problem. It will not be a Chinese problem. It will be humanity’s problem.
My legislation would direct the federal government to not just stop superintelligence here in the United States, but to work to prevent it from being developed anywhere around the world.
The future of humanity cannot be left in the hands of a handful of Big Tech oligarchs. The American people and people throughout the world must determine that future.