@matharium I don't see the issue - do you want a proof or a teacher? Reply to @matharium: Terence Tao says that the AI proof on the Navier–Stokes problem is correct, yet mathematicians learned almost nothing from it. The proof is 100 pages, AI-generated and full of issues in its text, but a formal certificate in the language Lean confirms it. Navier–Stokes is a Millennium Prize problem that asks whether the equations for fluids like water can start smooth and then blow up, with velocity or pressure becoming infinite. Human mathematicians came very close, and OpenAI ran its biggest model, with millions of dollars of compute, to get there first. A human proof normally comes with talks on what was tried, what worked and what it connects to, like picking fruit and planting the seeds. Tao calls this one strip mining: the fruit taken, the landscape left barren. One colleague, using lots of AI, could explain only half of it after days of work.