Cyberoffense/defense is probably going to eat up a TON of compute and end up a continuous compute-intensive arms race.
| Hanami
Cyberoffense/defense is probably going to eat up a TON of compute and end up a continuous compute-intensive arms race.
Even $AMZN CEO thinks cybersecurity would take up 20% of tokens consumed for the next year.
It's literally a problem of how much you throw at compute for vulnerability discovery + model capability, from of my chats w/ Horizon3.
And this is going to become a nation state issue, as seen with the implications already with PHP to vulnerabilities with banks/infrastructure from AI swarms.
But people see this and throw money at $CRWD, $NET, and others, which I was saying was a bubble.
If it's a compute issue, the economics go to the infra, from neoclouds to $NBIS to networking like $AAOI.
We'll likely see swarms go wild from aggressor nation states in the next few years.
And any country, whether that's Japan or EU that don't have their own capabilities might suffer severe damage.
US spent $11T+ cumulatively (inflation adjusted) on Nuclear weapons and we're like ~$1.8T into the the "cyber-nuclear weapon" equivalent of that
And this is not even including the endless other economic implications from AI in other fields from advancing cancer discovery to workforce automation with physical AI.
It's hard to measure AI sustainability if $50K in compute spend from a foreign actor can take down $10B of your own infrastructure.
AI has become a bipartisan national security issue, and even Democrats would not want China overtake the US in this field.
Quoted @cryptoislife05: @aleabitoreddit @belikejustin I believe they are worried about it being cyclical and unsustainable bro.
After AI agentic coding, what is realistically next for investors to be excited about? Agents like muse or grokbot? So far the traction has not been proven and is not exciting