El-Sayed made a considered decision not to condemn the Rebellion PAC ad *on Stevens's terms*, which included language ab | Hanami
El-Sayed made a considered decision not to condemn the Rebellion PAC ad *on Stevens's terms*, which included language about Israel politics that he didn't agree with. He said "I do not agree with the contents of that ad," and chided the media for playing the "condemn game" instead of asking relevant Qs about the stakes of the election.
Most Democrats are in just-win mode, and most MI Dems are all-in for El-Sayed, so the campaign watched Stevens get roundly condemned by her party. It was a factional argument, and he won it, while the national party was working with his campaign to win the Senate race.
It's rare for Democrats not to just hem and haw about a nominee, but to endorse the Republican. Rashida Tlaib didn't endorse Harris, Hilary Scholten won't endorse El-Sayed, but the possibility of Stevens actually crossing over to support Rogers looked unlikely. Until it happened.