@satyanadella extremely well put. I have been saying this, not as elegantly - we cannot rely on the disclosures of front | Hanami
@satyanadella extremely well put. I have been saying this, not as elegantly - we cannot rely on the disclosures of frontier LLMs alone: 1. These harnesses need to be constructed so that third parties can get involved in observability and transparency.. 2. As we get there we also can imagine users (enterprises) wanting to adapt the guardrails to their values, principles and business practices. One cannot imagine a global set of guardrails owned by the model creators. 3. No real business will be able to implement the enhanced capabilites of models if they remain black boxes, auditability, verification and compliance are essential premises to ensure that businesses can continue to operate showing duty of care. 4. Information securty architectures are consistent over decades, the AI architectures need to make room for us to be able to interface seamlessly, at speed and consistently - today all attempts by us are jerry rigged and band aids because we are trying to adapt to the speed of the model providers. If the AI industry doesn't support the simultaneous capability of the security industry things will stall. 5. To foster the diffusion of AI at speed and build trust we need to have momentum behind the conversation just initiated by Satya.