ZEROBASE WEEKLY 8.31–9.6
ZBT traded in a tight $0.080–$0.086 band this week, opening near $0.084 on August 31 and finishing around $0.085 by September 6. The token briefly dipped toward $0.080–$0.081 on September 2 before reclaiming the mid-$0.08s. Trading volumes stayed functional , generally in the $3–$10 million daily range, with liquidity remaining orderly and spreads contained.
The broader crypto market showed more range than the late-August squeeze. Total capitalization moved from roughly $2.59T–$2.63T at the start of the week to a Thursday peak near $2.82T as Bitcoin cleared $81,000, then settled back in the $2.67T–$2.79T area. That is a constructive but incomplete recovery from the mid-year trough near $2.3T.
Bitcoin opened the week near $78,550 on August 31, slipped to a weekly low around $76,250 on September 2, then ripped to a three-month high above $82,200 on September 3. It faded to the high-$79,000s after Friday’s jobs print and closed the week near $80,300–$80,350 — a net gain of about 2% from Monday’s open and roughly 5% from the weekly low. Ethereum moved in a narrower channel: from about $2,467 on August 31, down toward $2,356–$2,390 midweek, then back to $2,510–$2,516 by Sunday, a modest gain of around 2% on the week and about 6–7% from the low.
Derivatives confirmed the move was a squeeze, not a clean leverage rebuild. On September 3, 24-hour liquidations ran $400–$510 million, with shorts accounting for the bulk — roughly $345–$415 million of short liquidations that session, including about $162–$174 million in Bitcoin shorts. Open interest remained elevated near $54 billion on Bitcoin perps. Funding stayed near neutral to only mildly positive after the squeeze, suggesting traders were covering rather than aggressively adding new longs.
Macro and geopolitics were the week’s real drivers. The U.S.–Iran conflict, now in its seventh month, intensified again. Washington struck IRGC sites on the Iranian mainland early in the week, and both sides targeted vessels around the Strait of Hormuz. Hormuz traffic stayed depressed at roughly 10 commodity ships per day versus more than 130 pre-war. Oil responded immediately: WTI rose nearly 10% on the week to settle around $91.48 on Friday, while Brent gained about 7.6–7.8% to $96.28. Diesel hit a U.S. retail record near $5.85 a gallon. Energy inflation is no longer a one-day shock; it is a persistent input into the Fed’s reaction function.
Friday’s August employment report then flipped equity and rate markets. Nonfarm payrolls printed +162,000 versus a ~56,000 consensus, with prior months revised up by 55,000. Unemployment held at 4.1%. The 10-year yield finished near 4.78% and the 2-year near 4.37%. Markets immediately repriced the odds of a September rate hike higher. U.S. equities finished mixed for the week: the S&P 500 eked out a 0.1% gain to 7,718.60, the Nasdaq Composite rose 0.4% to 26,506.99, and the Dow fell 0.3% to 53,414.25. Friday itself was risk-off — S&P −0.38%, Dow −0.51%, Nasdaq Composite −0.29% — after the jobs surprise. Chip names limited the Nasdaq damage; credit-sensitive and consumer names did not.
Institutional crypto flows remained the structural offset. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs took in about $987 million net for the week ending September 4/5, extending a three-week streak to roughly $3.8 billion. The path was uneven: +$217 million on August 31, −$236.5 million on September 1, then +$101 million, a standout +$731 million on September 3 (largest single day since mid-January), and +$175 million on September 4. BlackRock’s IBIT again absorbed the majority. Ethereum ETFs added about $215 million, down ~74% from the prior week’s $816 million. Combined BTC+ETH ETF inflows were still ~$1.2 billion. Bitcoin ETF AUM sat near $101 billion. Year-to-date BTC ETF flows remain slightly negative, so this is repair, not a new cycle high in sponsorship.
Crypto-native news reinforced a rotation beneath Bitcoin. Zcash led the tape, breaking $1,000 and later trading above $1,150–$1,200 with a weekly gain approaching 40%, helped by ETF interest and a short squeeze. Uniswap jumped more than 50% on the week as DeFi breadth improved. Arbitrum ripped on Robinhood Chain activity.
Elsewhere: Liquid Network paused after a purported white-hat withdrawal of $320 million in bitcoin; Trezor said a ShipMonk breach affected tens of thousands more customers; the SEC floated a “Regulation Crypto Assets” framework with offering exemptions; and OpenReserve received preliminary OCC approval for a national bank charter. Privacy coins and infrastructure names outperformed beta.
Crypto Fear & Greed spent the week in greed, not fear. The index rose from 62 on August 31 to 69, 63, 65, then 74 on September 4, and held 73–74 into the weekend. Seven-day average was about 68; 30-day average about 54. Sentiment has flipped from the August mid-20s/30s readings, which is consistent with the price rebound but leaves less cushion if oil or the Fed surprise again.
On-chain data was more mixed than the ETF tape. Long-term holders are no longer in the aggressive distribution regime of earlier 2026, but they are not uniformly accumulating either. Whale flow flipped toward net exchange deposits later in the week (roughly +1,900 to +3,900 BTC on some sessions), and tracked large holders rotated size rather than simply stacking.
Dormant supply stirred: 2013-era wallets moved hundreds of BTC in early September, including a coordinated 200 BTC burst on September 5, while 2011 coins worth more than $7 million also woke up. OG five-year+ UTXO spend, on a 90-day average, rose toward ~1,500 BTC — higher than May, but still well below prior capitulation spikes. The read-through is consolidation and wallet hygiene more than a coordinated dump, yet it is not the one-way accumulation signal of a clean breakout.
In summary, August 31–September 6 was a squeeze week inside a still-contested macro regime. Spot Bitcoin and Ethereum recovered from the $76k / $2,360 area, ETF demand stayed real, and alt breadth improved via ZEC, UNI, and privacy/infrastructure names. Against that, Hormuz risk pushed oil to three-month highs, Friday’s 162k jobs print revived hike odds, U.S. equities stalled, and on-chain whales stopped being net buyers into strength.
The market is consolidating in the $80,000 Bitcoin / $2,500 Ether zone with institutional bids underneath and energy-geopolitical risk overhead. Next week’s CPI and the September FOMC path matter more than last week’s liquidations.
85·ALong
n
news9/3news
A consortium of twenty-one banks and asset managers, including Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Deutsche Bank, UBS, Fidelity and WisdomTree, will form a company in the second half of 2026 and issue a dollar-pegged stablecoin in the first half of 2027, then expand to the euro and other G7 currencies.
The group has more than doubled since an October 2025 exploration by ten banks. Sponsors say the token will serve wholesale, institutional and retail uses, from cross-border payments to tokenized-asset settlement, and will be designed to comply with the U.S. GENIUS Act and, where relevant, the EU’s MiCA rules.
Private dollar tokens already dominate on-chain settlement. Tether still leads with more than $180 billion outstanding, recycling reserves into short-term Treasuries. Circle’s USDC is the main regulated rival. A bank coin will not automatically displace them; Société Générale’s earlier dollar token showed how little demand appears without distribution and liquidity.
Markets still treated the plan as a competitive threat. Circle shares fell about six percent as investors priced in the risk that large banks would keep more of the float, distribution and reserve economics on their own rails.
The contest is also a fight over the architecture of money. The GENIUS Act, signed in July 2025, created the first federal regime for payment stablecoins: one-to-one reserves in cash, insured deposits and short-dated government paper, monthly disclosures, anti-money-laundering and sanctions duties, and a finding that such tokens are neither securities nor federally insured deposits.
Core licensing rules phase in around January 2027, which is why the launch window is not arbitrary. A market-structure bill, often called the Clarity Act, faces a Senate test in mid-September. Crypto firms have poured a record $190 million to more than $200 million into the 2026 midterms, becoming the largest corporate political spender, to lock in those rules and preserve banking access. Their 2024 outlays helped produce the stablecoin statute; this cycle is an attempt to finish the federal framework before control of Congress may shift.
Geopolitics pulls the other way. Dollar stablecoins already function as a private extension of reserve-currency status. The Bank for International Settlements has warned that large-scale adoption abroad can amount to digital dollarization, weakening local policy transmission.
ECB President Christine Lagarde has argued that privately issued stablecoins, even in euros, pose risks to monetary policy and financial stability. Isabel Schnabel has called them complements, not substitutes, for central-bank money and urged official settlement to move on-chain.
That is why Qivalis, a thirty-seven-bank European consortium, is racing to launch a euro token later in 2026 under Dutch supervision. Some lenders, including BBVA, sit in both groups. The result is a contest among dollar rails, euro rails and official experiments in tokenized deposits.
The political overlay is American. President Trump’s support revived institutional interest after the 2024 crypto rebound, and his family’s World Liberty Financial has issued its own token. That proximity has complicated talks on rewards, illicit finance and self-dealing. November’s midterms will decide whether the current statutory path is completed or reopened.
Banks are positioning for regulated digital dollars as ordinary plumbing. Crypto-native firms are spending to keep that plumbing from being written only in bank language. Central banks elsewhere are trying to keep the settlement layer public. The 2027 coin is less a product launch than a bet that the dollar, U.S. law and large-balance-sheet distribution will still define the next generation of digital money even as geopolitics, inflation and elections keep rewriting the terms.